As Hussein Obama continues to escalate his war on whites and war on cops it’s interesting to take a look back at a document prepared just after he took over, when he first assumed the squatting position in America’s White House.
The April 7th, 2009 report by the Department of Homeland “Security” is titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” Nowhere in the report does the government identify the very real threat of Islamic terror but it has no problem assigning racist guilt by skin color to a broad variety of Caucasian Americans.
The report describes its scope as being to “facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States” in the interest of fighting terrorist attacks. The only problem is they point in 180 degrees the wrong direction, blaming the innocent and ignoring the terrorists and their sympathizers. The intent is obviously to assign blame where it isn’t and obstruct and obfuscate where it is, an early day Obama anti-white hit piece.
While admitting in the document that rhetoric is the only product of any of the groups they identify and there have been zero violent acts, they focus on the wide open fields of “what if,” to create their fair-complected villains. Capitalizing on Obama’s racial composition in order to handcuff his opposition, the report states, “Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president” for recruiting, mobilization and broadening their appeal. Notice they did not hyphenate African American, which literally means he is an African, in the position of American ‘president.’
It conveniently predicted the response to Obama’s threats against the nation, stating “The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.
Those are all legitimate concerns in areas in which Obama has been attacking the United States. We’re supposed to sit quietly by as we are fitted with our shackles?
It goes on to tip the Obama agenda, casting patriots as terrorists, stating that the possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities forcing them to become terrorists. We see the first draft of what would later become Jihadi Jeh Johnson’s standard stump speech where it declares that those difficulties “could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.”
The DHS paper states, “The historical election of an African American president (again, not hyphenated) and the prospect of policy changes are proving to be a driving force for rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization.” Mere policy changes have never been enough to force Americans to challenge their government in the manner they are expressing concerns over. Clearly the subversives in the Obama regime were plotting something unconstitutional from the beginning. That is the basis for their focus on vilifying white people, white veterans, and now white police officers.
The extent to which the current disastrous state of affairs was pre-planned by this regime is evident in one section that describes the domestic “accomplishments” of the Obama regime before the fact. Equating Christians, patriots, Constitution respecting Americans and non-Marxists with extremism, Under “Revisiting the 1990s.” it states, “Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the 1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion, inter-racial crimes, and same-sex marriage.”
Not being a Democrat anti-American is defined by this Homeland Security document as being a right-wing, potentially violent, extremist.
This is part one; another article will follow shortly focusing further on this public document that can be viewed at the Federation of American Scientists website here. Another enlightening summary of their 2009 preemptive attack, demeaning “conspiracy theorists” and targeting opponents of their open borders, gun control, and their global government agenda follows this one.